Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-glabandon
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-glabandon channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:26 p.m.
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-11 03:04 a.m. @krabz has added @sinz to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-11 10:55 a.m.@sinz Can you drop the pdf of the info and AOPC in this channel
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-11 01:23 p.m.@sinz You don’t need to amend it but for future reference there’s some phrases in here that aren’t really necessary 
sinz 2025-03-11 01:24 p.m.
Okay
sinzOkay
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-11 01:53 p.m.
https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Mangione-Indictment-FINAL-as-filed.pdf
Statute:
Good Information
Better Information
Bad Information
Bad Information
Statute:
§ 125.25 Murder in the second degree. “A person is guilty of murder in the second degree when: 1. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the death of such person or of a third person”
Good Information
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about February 22, 2025, with the intent to cause the death of another person, caused the death of sadoimpacto.
Better Information
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about February 22, 2025, with the intent to cause the death of another person, caused the death of sadoimpacto, to wit, by fatally shooting him with a modified assault weapon.
Bad Information
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about February 22, 2025, with intent to kill did shoot and kill the victim and did so with malicious intent and with an assault weapon.
Bad Information
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about February 22, 2025, did kill the victim intentionally.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-11 01:53 p.m.
For your and others reference
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-11 01:53 p.m.
Just restate the elements of the statute in the first half
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-11 01:53 p.m.
And then “to wit” to the specific conduct
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-11 01:53 p.m.
Concision
sinz 2025-03-11 02:17 p.m.
Okay
sinz 2025-03-11 09:51 p.m.
i assume we are waiting on the summons now?
sinzi assume we are waiting on the summons now?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:15 a.m.
Draft me one
sinzsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:16 p.m.
Upload it to drive
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄUpload it to drive
sinzsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:19 p.m.
Can you send the summons and the discord invite to the defendant
sinz 2025-03-12 01:19 p.m.
ya
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄCan you send the summons and the discord invite to the defendant
sinz 2025-03-12 01:22 p.m. 
sinz 2025-03-12 01:22 p.m.
cant find him
sinzClick to see attachment.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:22 p.m.
Search for him in the sidebar
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄSearch for him in the sidebar
sinz 2025-03-12 01:24 p.m. 
sinzClick to see attachment.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:26 p.m.
No?
sinz 2025-03-12 01:27 p.m.
nope
sinzClick to see attachment.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:28 p.m.
What I need you to do is provide an affidavit basically saying that you tried looking for him in the discord and couldn’t locate him
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:28 p.m.
And then I’m going to enter a plea of not guilty on his behalf and we will get him a public defender
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:28 p.m.
And proceed
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:30 p.m.
Actually
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:30 p.m.
I can’t really proceed
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:30 p.m.
I’m just gonna sign an arrest warrant
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:30 p.m.
And keep this on the docket for as long as it takes
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 01:31 p.m.
Statute of limitations, if any, will not toll
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:26 p.m.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:26 p.m.
UserMessage could not be loaded.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 03:16 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄClick to see attachment.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-12 03:16 p.m.@Clark County Sheriff's Office
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:00 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: Pursuant to 5 M.S.C. 1 § 2203.1, I designate Magistrate Judge AdamJSherman to monitor all proceedings in this case.
@AdamC_2001 @sinz
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:26 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:00 p.m.@AdamC_2001 This is probably going to stay on your docket forever
sinz 2025-03-14 02:00 p.m.
adam can we continue in absentia?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:00 p.m.
No because
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:00 p.m.
He'd have to have already appeared
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:00 p.m.
And then left
sinz 2025-03-14 02:00 p.m.
0u
sinz 2025-03-14 02:01 p.m.
oh
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:01 p.m.
no it’s not
krabz 2025-03-14 02:01 p.m.
troll
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:01 p.m.
It will if I say it will
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:02 p.m.
this case is not taking 500 years pal
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:02 p.m.
let’s get started though
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:02 p.m.
We already started
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:02 p.m.
He's not been apprehended(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:02 p.m.
A summons issued but he's not in the Clark County discord
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:02 p.m.
So he cannot be located
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:03 p.m.
Go get honor to track him down
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:03 p.m.
That's what the arrest warrant is for
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:03 p.m.
aw don’t mean he’s gonna join the discord
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:03 p.m.
Whatever he can serve his little sentence in the game if this is what he wants to do
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:04 p.m.@sinz My advise from now on don't prosecute people who aren't in the CC discord
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:04 p.m.
Not worth anyone's time
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:04 p.m.
Unless they're like a serial bomber
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:04 p.m.
trick him tell him we got candy or something
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:04 p.m.
this is gonna take a while my goodness
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
Every few days I wanted you to ping @sinz and say "Is he caught yet?" just like that
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.@sinz Is he caught yet?
sinz 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.@sinz You may only respond yes or no
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
Nothing else
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
"Yes."
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
"No."
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
What if we says maybe
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
he
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
180 minute contempt
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:05 p.m.
ok
AdamC_2001 2025-03-14 02:06 p.m.
sinz 2025-03-21 11:28 a.m.
I no longer work for the DOJ, @walter! is taking over this case
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-26 04:09 p.m. @meowiitten has added @Funpark22 to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:09 p.m.@Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:09 p.m.
Alright
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:12 p.m.So the state moves to nolle prosequi this case.
Here's why:
1. 1/2 of the evidence provided in the AOPC is inadmissible due to taking statements from the defendant without proof of a Miranda waiver
2. The clip that is supposedly incriminating the defendant is like 3 seconds long.
3. That 3 seconds long clip contains no POID. ~13 days after the incident a picture was taken from the defendant's profile. Too much time to conclude that this was actually the defendant. POID is old.
4. The entire CJO practically (hyperbole) has agreed to drop this case.
Here's why:
1. 1/2 of the evidence provided in the AOPC is inadmissible due to taking statements from the defendant without proof of a Miranda waiver
2. The clip that is supposedly incriminating the defendant is like 3 seconds long.
3. That 3 seconds long clip contains no POID. ~13 days after the incident a picture was taken from the defendant's profile. Too much time to conclude that this was actually the defendant. POID is old.
4. The entire CJO practically (hyperbole) has agreed to drop this case.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:12 p.m.
Also 5. The AOPC isn't sworn to anyone
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:12 p.m.
6. The AOPC's affiant doesn't really talk about their investigative experience.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:13 p.m.
-
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:13 p.m.
My AAG can agree that we should drop this case.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:13 p.m.
CC: @AdamC_2001
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:14 p.m.
Surely you believe that even if the clip is "3 seconds long," the defendant's identity can be corroborated by witness testimony
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:14 p.m.
Also the AOPC is implicitly sworn to the state attorney who filed this case. That's not a fatal defect
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:16 p.m.
Moreover, there are exceptions to non-mirandized interrogations that allow for statements to be admissible
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:17 p.m.
I don't know why you'd bring this case, subject the defendant to a warrant, and then come back and unilaterally cast doubt over the state's entire case
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:17 p.m.
You'd have to ask judge your honor
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:17 p.m.
I don't know his plan really.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:17 p.m.
With him leaving
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:17 p.m.
Adam gave the case to me
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:18 p.m.
I saw this case, showing it to the office and they weren't pleased.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:18 p.m.
showed*
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:18 p.m.
I am the judge
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:18 p.m.
Adam is the magistrate
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:18 p.m.
Judge as in justhejudge1
sinznope
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:18 p.m.
him
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:20 p.m.
Adam is also the AAG for the CJO.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:21 p.m.
Your honor, the state simply doesn't want to prosecute this case further.
Funpark22Adam is also the AAG for the CJO.
krabz 2025-03-26 04:24 p.m.
Bruh since when
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:24 p.m.
Also, krabz dms.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:24 p.m.
While I have you
Funpark22sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:24 p.m.
Given the fact that he is charged with attempted murder — and the fact that dismissal lies solely within my discretion — I'm not going to accept the state's request for nolle prosequi.
The only issue is securing the defendant for his appearance; and that's only a problem because he's not in the Discord. But that is the state's job to secure him. Go to his Roblox profile and join other Discords he might be in. There are many ways to go about this. I'm not going to dismiss a case simply because you refuse to put in the legwork despite bringing this case. I didn't find probable cause for no reason.
If you really think that the evidence isthat tainted — and that the investigation was improper — then file an affidavit avering to all of these facts and I'll have to deal with that accordingly.
The only issue is securing the defendant for his appearance; and that's only a problem because he's not in the Discord. But that is the state's job to secure him. Go to his Roblox profile and join other Discords he might be in. There are many ways to go about this. I'm not going to dismiss a case simply because you refuse to put in the legwork despite bringing this case. I didn't find probable cause for no reason.
If you really think that the evidence is
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:25 p.m.
Until then, the warrant stands and this cases continues
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:27 p.m.
It's the state's job to summon the defendant?
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:28 p.m. 
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:28 p.m.
Yes it is. Do you want me to go out and execute the warrant personally?
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:28 p.m.
I appreciate your sarcasm sado
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:28 p.m.
your honor*
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:28 p.m.
apologies
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:28 p.m.
Typing too fast.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄClick to see attachment.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:29 p.m.
I see.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:29 p.m.
So we're essentially waiting on him to be found
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:29 p.m.
Yup
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:30 p.m.
If he really cannot be located, isn't that again just another grounds to nolle?
UserMessage could not be loaded.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:31 p.m.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:31 p.m.
Perfect example here
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:32 p.m.
Here, the defendant left the contact of their defender^^^
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:32 p.m.
Is this court deciding to just continue to keep finding him?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:33 p.m.
Yup
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:33 p.m.
It's not pre-arraignment delay if he won't join the Discord
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:34 p.m.
That's active evasion on his part
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:34 p.m.
Is the defendant aware that there's a case against him?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:34 p.m.
Who knows
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:34 p.m.
So ig we're going to be here a while
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:35 p.m.
So we're simply waiting for him to be found in game
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:35 p.m.
Then hopefully the officer tells him to join the discord server.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:36 p.m.
Is that how this court is moving? Or?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 04:36 p.m.
Yes
Funpark22 2025-03-26 04:39 p.m.
Ok, so we're going to be here for a very very very very very very very long time.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 08:34 p.m.@meowiitten Could you direct the sheriff to summon: blitzhunteer
Funpark22 2025-03-26 08:34 p.m.
That's the defendant's discord username.
Funpark22 2025-03-26 08:34 p.m.
Or however you wish to proceed.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-03-26 08:42 p.m.@Clark County Sheriff's Office @Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-03-27 04:20 p.m.@meowiitten
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-04-04 03:00 p.m.
are you asking for a toll of statute of lims @Funpark22
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-04-04 03:01 p.m.
if not continue
shah_khaled ᴘᴄare you asking for a toll of statute of lims @Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-04-04 11:14 p.m.
I submitted the affidavit. Sheriff was supposed to summon the defendant
Funpark22 2025-04-04 11:15 p.m.
We haven't gotten anywhere since
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-04-27 10:36 a.m.
This is reassigned to @Toby Ellis, Esq.
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-27 12:20 p.m.
Hi
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-27 12:20 p.m.@Funpark22 Where are we with this
Funpark22 2025-04-27 01:19 p.m.
I nolle
Funpark22 2025-04-27 01:19 p.m.
I was denied
Funpark22 2025-04-27 01:20 p.m.
I filed an affidacit stating inability to prosecute
Funpark22I nolle
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-27 01:50 p.m.
paper please
Funpark22 2025-04-27 10:51 p.m.
Will give tmr @Toby Ellis, Esq.
Funpark22 2025-04-27 10:51 p.m.
I got a ton of stuff to do
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-28 03:17 a.m.
Np
Funpark22 2025-04-29 12:19 a.m.@Toby Ellis, Esq.
Funpark22 2025-04-29 12:19 a.m.
Courtesy copy
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-29 03:14 a.m.@Funpark22 A clerk has just advised me that the Defendant is in the Clark County discord server
Funpark22 2025-04-29 08:58 a.m.
He has also dmed me
Funpark22 2025-04-29 08:58 a.m.
I still ask for my motion to be considered
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-29 04:24 p.m.@Funpark22 you dont even ask for a nolle prosequi in the motion lol
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-29 04:24 p.m.
its just a statement of facts
Funpark22 2025-04-30 02:32 a.m.
Would you prefer I add a relief section?
Funpark22Would you prefer I add a relief section?
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-04-30 04:44 p.m.
I'd like for you to actually state that you wish for this court to enter nolle prosequi for this matter, and whether or not you have a preference on what type of dismissal it may be, whether that is with or without prejudice
Toby Ellis, Esq.I'd like for you to actually state that you wish for this court to enter nolle prosequi for this matter, and whether or not you have a preference on what type of dismissal it may b...
Funpark22 2025-04-30 11:55 p.m.
Within the motion or want me to state it here?
Funpark22Within the motion or want me to state it here?
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-05-01 05:23 a.m.
Motion
Funpark22 2025-05-01 09:09 a.m.
Will do
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-02 02:42 p.m.
This is still my case
Funpark22sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-02 02:42 p.m.
Why would you try to go over my head and nolle with the magistrate when I denied it the first time
Toby Ellis, Esq.Funpark22 2025-05-02 04:48 p.m.@meowiitten I answered his question
Funpark22 2025-05-02 04:48 p.m.
He told me to put it to paper
Funpark22 2025-05-02 04:48 p.m.
So I did
Funpark22 2025-05-02 04:48 p.m.
I’m simply following the magistrate’s telling
Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-05-02 04:52 p.m.
I read "I nolle" as you were moving for the court to enter nolle prosequi
Funpark22sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-02 04:55 p.m.
This is my response
Funpark22 2025-05-03 12:26 a.m.
Your honor, I really don't understand why you won't let us nolle
Funpark22 2025-05-03 12:26 a.m.
The State doesn't want to pursue this case yet it seems you want us to.
Funpark22 2025-05-03 12:27 a.m.
I'm confused on what Your honor toby, is talking about versus what your honor is talking about.
Funpark22The State doesn't want to pursue this case yet it seems you want us to.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:31 a.m.
Yes I do
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:31 a.m.
Your honor, I don't wish to start anything but it seems like you're showing potential bias
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
Feel free to call me incorrect on that
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
But it simply seems that way.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
Yes you are incorrect
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
Alright.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
Do you understand that I’m supposed to accept whatever you say in the information as true
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
So if you allege that a defendant brutally murdered someone with an axe—a hypothetical
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
And you ask me to dismiss the case
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
As the prosecutor
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:33 a.m.
I am supposed to accept that set of factual circumstances as true
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:33 a.m.
And decide if the interests of justice warrant dismissal
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:33 a.m.
Even if the state is so inclined not to prosecute
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:33 a.m.
Your honor, I never wrote the CI or the AOPC
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:34 a.m.
I still understand though that you are to trust our word.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:34 a.m.
I found probable cause to issue the arrest warrant(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:34 a.m.
That was based on the AOPC
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:35 a.m.
And those exhibits
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:35 a.m.
And the information
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:35 a.m.
This case as a whole
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:35 a.m.
He's still not within this courtroom
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:35 a.m.
Last time I checked I believe
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:35 a.m.
Then you can try to manually summon him by inviting him
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:35 a.m.
Otherwise the AW will stand
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄThen you can try to manually summon him by inviting him
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:36 a.m.
so this is the defendant that we cannot contact
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:36 a.m.
Yet we're trying to find in game
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:36 a.m.
Correct?
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:37 a.m.
I also found him in the main discord server
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:37 a.m.
If you could get a sheriff to summon him via dms pursuant to rules.
blitzhunteer is the discord username
blitzhunteer is the discord username
Funpark22If you could get a sheriff to summon him via dms pursuant to rules. blitzhunteer is the discord username
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:38 a.m.
You can arrange that I imagine
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:39 a.m.
The sheriff never responds to me
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:39 a.m.
How come?
Funpark22I also found him in the main discord server
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:39 a.m.
DM him the invite to this discord
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:39 a.m.
And then I will use the summon command
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:40 a.m.
"In every case of felony, the presiding judge where an information has been presented, and probable cause has been established, shall deliver such copy to a Sheriff's Deputy, together with a writ directed to such Deputy, commanding him forthwith to deliver such certified copy to the accused. " See Mayfl. R. Crim. P. 3(4)
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:41 a.m.
In fact another case was just sua sponte mistrial'd for failure to follow this
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:41 a.m.See State of Mayflower v. dawnslayerontop https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1345890215557857353/1358146121968517191
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:41 a.m.
slayers*
UserMessage could not be loaded.
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:42 a.m.
Funpark22In fact another case was just sua sponte mistrial'd for failure to follow this
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:47 a.m.
That’s kind of moronic
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:47 a.m.
You have your own opinion your honor. I'm simply stating a very recent mistrial that resembles the path you are encroaching on.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:49 a.m.
What I’m saying is moronic is why he declared a mistrial
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:50 a.m.
All that matters is that he’s informed of the charges against him and brought before me
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:51 a.m.
That’s a harmless error at worst(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:51 a.m.
And horizontal stare decisis I need not bother with
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:54 a.m.@Funpark22 So please
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:54 a.m.
DM him the invite link
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-03 01:54 a.m.
No more groveling over a harmless error
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄDM him the invite link
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:01 a.m.
As you say
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:03 a.m.@meowiitten 
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-07 02:54 a.m.
Is he here
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-07 02:54 a.m.
Nope
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-10 04:48 p.m.
This case is assigned to @andysofun (for the sole purpose of being a caretaker; no action needed)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-10 04:50 p.m. @meowiitten has added @andysofun to the case channel.
Case Modified
Funpark22Funpark22 2025-05-11 02:32 a.m.
CC: @andysofun
Hi, Andy. This was sent in as a result of the denial of nolle
Hi, Andy. This was sent in as a result of the denial of nolle
Funpark22 2025-05-11 02:32 a.m.
It seems to be of been forgotten
Funpark22 2025-05-11 02:32 a.m.
your honor*
Funpark22 2025-05-11 02:32 a.m.
IT's 1:32 AM
Funpark22 2025-05-11 02:32 a.m.
I need sleep
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-11 10:44 a.m.
It’s denied
Funpark22 2025-05-11 04:44 p.m.
Alright
Funpark22 2025-05-11 04:44 p.m.
I guess we'll be waiting here a very long time.
Funpark22 2025-05-15 09:49 p.m.@G L A B A N D O N @meowiitten
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-15 09:49 p.m. @meowiitten has added @G L A B A N D O N to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-15 09:49 p.m.@G L A B A N D O N Well well well
Funpark22 2025-05-15 09:51 p.m.
Also
Funpark22 2025-05-15 09:51 p.m.
Posting this for whatever's sake
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-20 07:17 p.m. @meowiitten has added @bob78711new to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-20 07:17 p.m.@bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 07:52 p.m.
I have a conflict
bob78711new 2025-05-20 07:53 p.m.
me and funpark are very close friends
bob78711new 2025-05-20 07:53 p.m.@meowiitten
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-20 07:55 p.m.
That’s not a conflict of interest
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-20 08:00 p.m.
If you two were married or roommates I would then consider it one
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-20 08:00 p.m.
But a cordial relationship isn’t disqualifying
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄBut a cordial relationship isn’t disqualifying
bob78711new 2025-05-20 09:51 p.m.
I taught him law...
bob78711new 2025-05-20 09:51 p.m.
that count?
bob78711newI taught him law...
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-20 10:00 p.m.
Were you a mentor or just a teacher
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄWere you a mentor or just a teacher
bob78711new 2025-05-20 10:20 p.m.
mentor
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-20 10:28 p.m.@bob78711new Ask your client if he wants to waive the potential COI
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄbob78711new 2025-05-20 10:32 p.m.
if my client speaks that is lol
bob78711new 2025-05-20 10:32 p.m.
most just ignore court
bob78711new 2025-05-20 10:33 p.m.
will ask
bob78711new 2025-05-23 01:02 a.m.@meowiitten It appears this case will likely be in absentia
bob78711new 2025-05-23 01:02 a.m.
AKA he never responsed so he cant wave COI
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-23 01:05 a.m.
Ok
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-24 04:03 p.m.@G L A B A N D O N
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-24 04:03 p.m. @meowiitten has added @G L A B A N D O N to the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-24 04:03 p.m.@G L A B A N D O N
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 07:01 p.m.
Well, he is here
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 07:02 p.m.@G L A B A N D O N Key Rights at Arraignment:
Right to Counsel: Defendants have the right to an attorney, and if they cannot afford one, the court will appoint a public defender.
Right to be Informed of Charges: The defendant must be formally advised of the charges against them.
Right to Remain Silent: The defendant has the right to remain silent and not incriminate themselves.
Right to a Fair Trial: The state must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Right to Present Evidence: The defendant has the right to present evidence and call witnesses.
Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses: The defendant can question witnesses who testify against them.
Right to Bail: The defendant may be released on bail or on their own recognizance, depending on the circumstances.
Right to Preliminary Hearing (Felony Cases): In felony cases, there is a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial.
Right to Counsel: Defendants have the right to an attorney, and if they cannot afford one, the court will appoint a public defender.
Right to be Informed of Charges: The defendant must be formally advised of the charges against them.
Right to Remain Silent: The defendant has the right to remain silent and not incriminate themselves.
Right to a Fair Trial: The state must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Right to Present Evidence: The defendant has the right to present evidence and call witnesses.
Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses: The defendant can question witnesses who testify against them.
Right to Bail: The defendant may be released on bail or on their own recognizance, depending on the circumstances.
Right to Preliminary Hearing (Felony Cases): In felony cases, there is a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 07:02 p.m.
COUNT 1: ATTEMPTED MURDER (1 M.S.C. § 2301)
On or about February 22, 2025, Defendant Glabandon, with the intention to kill
and with malice, did take a substantial step toward committing murder by
discharging a firearm multiple times at a Mayflower Transportation Authority
(MTA) operator, YourExclusiveSalad, while he was operating an MTS vehicle, but
failed to cause death due to bulletproof windows, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 2301.
COUNT 2: BRANDISHING A FIREARM IN CITY LIMITS (1 M.S.C. § 7101)
On or about February 22, 2025, Defendant Glabandon did turn a firearm on
another player, to wit, YourExclusiveSalad, and carried it in his hands within the
city limits of Lander, not in lawful self-defense, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 7101.
CRIMINAL INFORMATION - 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT 3: DISCHARGING A FIREARM IN CITY LIMITS (1 M.S.C. § 7102)
On or about February 22, 2025, Defendant Glabandon did discharge a firearm at
least seven times within the city limits of Lander, not in lawful self-defense,
targeting an MTA operator who posed no threat, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 7102.
On or about February 22, 2025, Defendant Glabandon, with the intention to kill
and with malice, did take a substantial step toward committing murder by
discharging a firearm multiple times at a Mayflower Transportation Authority
(MTA) operator, YourExclusiveSalad, while he was operating an MTS vehicle, but
failed to cause death due to bulletproof windows, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 2301.
COUNT 2: BRANDISHING A FIREARM IN CITY LIMITS (1 M.S.C. § 7101)
On or about February 22, 2025, Defendant Glabandon did turn a firearm on
another player, to wit, YourExclusiveSalad, and carried it in his hands within the
city limits of Lander, not in lawful self-defense, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 7101.
CRIMINAL INFORMATION - 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT 3: DISCHARGING A FIREARM IN CITY LIMITS (1 M.S.C. § 7102)
On or about February 22, 2025, Defendant Glabandon did discharge a firearm at
least seven times within the city limits of Lander, not in lawful self-defense,
targeting an MTA operator who posed no threat, in violation of 1 M.S.C. § 7102.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 07:03 p.m.MINUTE ENTRY: Return on Summons/Initial Appearance/Arraignment as to Counts 1, 2, and 3 held on 05/29/2025. GLABANDON appeared with counsel. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered as to Counts 1, 2, and 3 (Entered: 05/29/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:26 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 07:04 p.m.PAPERLESS BRADY ORDER: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court confirms the State's obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence—namely, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's case—as required by the principles established in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The State is hereby ORDERED to fulfill this obligation. The State has a duty to disclose any evidence that negates the defendant's guilt, affects the credibility of a witness, or could potentially reduce a sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without needing to make a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, dismissal of the information, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/29/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:26 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 07:04 p.m.PAPERLESS STANDING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY ORDER: All parties are ordered to adhere to the following pretrial timelines. The pretrial window will close ten (10) days from May 29, 2025, concluding on June 8, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. By June 3, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST, all parties must disclose a final draft of their exhibit lists and witness lists. Additionally, all motions in limine must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours before the trial, with any oppositions due twenty-four (24) hours following the filing of such motions. Trial briefs, if any, are to be submitted no later than forty-eight (48) hours before the trial. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/29/2025)
@bob78711new @Funpark22
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:26 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄFunpark22 2025-05-29 09:03 p.m.
Well, he didn't appear to this. He never said any plea. Are you assuming not guilty based off of a trial in absentia?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 09:03 p.m.
Yees
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 09:03 p.m.
He did appear
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 09:03 p.m.
He is very much here
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 09:04 p.m.
I consider him being added to this channel appearance
Funpark22 2025-05-29 09:52 p.m.
Alr
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄYees
Funpark22 2025-06-02 05:09 p.m.
My discovery filing is done. I'm simply waiting to interview our only witness.
Funpark22My discovery filing is done. I'm simply waiting to interview our only witness.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 05:45 p.m.
Is it on the website?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 07:15 p.m.@Brenda Cornwallis @Kezzera Can you reassign this case
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 07:15 p.m.
Perhaps to Mr. @adlithestevenson
AlbertWellesley ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 08:16 p.m.
recusal?
AlbertWellesley ᴘᴄrecusal?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 08:49 p.m.
He killed me in the game yesterday so yes
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 08:49 p.m.
I forgot to do it then
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄIs it on the website?
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:20 p.m.
No.
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:20 p.m.@bob78711new Are you fine without a disclosure of the witness?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:20 p.m.
I would assume this case is stayed pending reassignment
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:20 p.m.
Perfect
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:20 p.m.
More time for me to interview this guy
Funpark22bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:34 p.m.
wdym?
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:34 p.m.
A disclosure in the discovery document outlining an interview with the witness
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:34 p.m.
As this will limit possible ability for you to create a more effective defensne
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:34 p.m.
defense*
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:35 p.m.
You've lost me mate
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:35 p.m.
Those things are required to be submited no?
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:35 p.m.
He won't respond to me
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄHe killed me in the game yesterday so yes
AlbertWellesley ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:35 p.m.@Brenda Cornwallis we'll take this as voluntary recusal and available for reassignment
AlbertWellesley ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:35 p.m.@meowiitten enter an order on the website please
Funpark22He won't respond to me
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:36 p.m.
Your witness?
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:36 p.m.
Yes.
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:36 p.m.
well then just disclose him
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:36 p.m.
Upon reassignment and a new discovery date set, and still no response from the prime layman witness, then we can revisit this conversation.
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:36 p.m.
you dont need to call him
Funpark22Upon reassignment and a new discovery date set, and still no response from the prime layman witness, then we can revisit this conversation.
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:36 p.m.
yeah
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:37 p.m.
Bob, I haven't even begun an interview
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:37 p.m.
I've only asked for truthful responses and if he remembers.
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:37 p.m.
I've yet to recieve anything.
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:37 p.m.
So there's nothing to disclose...
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:37 p.m.
There's no substance provided yet.
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:37 p.m.
Unless you'd love to my questions to him that are being left unanswered. 
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:38 p.m.
love to see my*
Funpark22Bob, I haven't even begun an interview
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:38 p.m.
If I am not mistaken, you still have to disclose a witness even if they were not deposed
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
On my draft so far, they are written down.
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
What I'm talking about with disclosures is the section that outlines any disclosures we have
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
IE criminal reports
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
tests
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
past offenses
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
interviews
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
interrogations
Funpark22 2025-06-03 10:39 p.m.
Like, yes I know you must state the witness, but there's no interview there.
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:40 p.m.
yeah thats fine
bob78711new 2025-06-03 10:40 p.m.
I trust you enough to put a deposition on there if you've got one
adlithestevenson 2025-06-04 12:48 a.m.
Transferred to my docket
adlithestevenson 2025-06-04 12:57 a.m.@Funpark22 and @bob78711new where are we here?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄFunpark22 2025-06-04 02:17 a.m.
trial in absentia. Awaiting my witness to respond to my dms for an interview that has barely begun. Requesting a discovery extension. @adlithestevenson
ryan 2025-06-04 01:07 p.m.
For what purpose? @Funpark22
ryan 2025-06-04 01:08 p.m.
Why did you not conduct this interview prior to filing?
ryan 2025-06-04 01:08 p.m.
You have a ton of time to interview witnesses and prepare a case, I don't want to delay because you havne't done your due dilligence before filing
ryanWhy did you not conduct this interview prior to filing?
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:09 p.m.
I didn't file this case, your honor.
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:09 p.m.
I was thrusted into it
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:09 p.m.
I even submitted a motion to nolle
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:09 p.m.
That was denied by sado
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:09 p.m.
I sent in an affidavit saying I really do not want to prosecute this case. It was denied by sado.
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:11 p.m.
Justhejudge1 had this case prior
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:11 p.m.
He got removed
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:11 p.m.
I got thrusted into it
Funpark22 2025-06-04 03:11 p.m.
So please give me some slack, your honor. As for myself, I never had a say in even filing this case to begin with.
bob78711new 2025-06-05 11:08 p.m.
Your honor, why not just revisit that motion to nolle and save us all a headache
bob78711new 2025-06-05 11:09 p.m.
It’s obvious the government does not want to prosecute this
ryan 2025-06-06 02:18 a.m.
i won't be visiting old business decided under another judge without an official motion for reconsideration
Funpark22So please give me some slack, your honor. As for myself, I never had a say in even filing this case to begin with.
ryan 2025-06-06 02:20 a.m.
You represent the justice department and, thus, the larger populus. I am denying your request for an extension.
ryan 2025-06-06 02:21 a.m.
We'll proceed to trial immediately unless there is any residual business? @bob78711new @Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:38 p.m.
Ok, sending in discovery now
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:38 p.m.@bob78711new There's no interview on there of the witness
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:38 p.m.
Both injures both parties here.
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:38 p.m.
great english. Redundant both
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:39 p.m. 
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:39 p.m.
Not even a scroll wheel
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:44 p.m.
Courtesy copy @ryan
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:45 p.m.
God this case is old
Funpark22 2025-06-06 03:56 p.m.
oops set the wrong presiding officer
Funpark22Ok, sending in discovery now
ryan 2025-06-07 02:41 a.m.
Why was this not submitted by the 3rd of June?
Funpark22Funpark22 2025-06-07 04:10 p.m.
Review this conversation @ryan
Funpark22trial in absentia. Awaiting my witness to respond to my dms for an interview that has barely begun. Requesting a discovery extension. @adlithestevenson
Funpark22 2025-06-07 04:10 p.m.
a
Funpark22 2025-06-07 04:11 p.m.
I didn't want to submit a discovery with information missing
Funpark22 2025-06-07 04:11 p.m.
I notified the court and the adverse counselor of this issue
Funpark22 2025-06-07 04:11 p.m.
Including your honor sado as well
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄI would assume this case is stayed pending reassignment
Funpark22 2025-06-07 04:11 p.m.
a
Funpark22 2025-06-07 04:12 p.m.
Apologies for my tardiness
ryan 2025-06-08 01:00 a.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-06-08 01:00 a.m.@bob78711new you have 48 hours to file anything
ryan 2025-06-08 01:00 a.m.
And we'll jump immediately into trial if there's no other concerns
ryanbob78711new 2025-06-08 10:28 a.m.
Alright
ryan 2025-06-10 04:47 a.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-06-10 04:47 a.m.@bob78711new @Funpark22 trial start ASAP
ryanbob78711new 2025-06-10 11:38 a.m.
Your honor, another development in the recusal situation, we are now both work together at MSU which could present even more bias
bob78711new 2025-06-10 11:38 a.m.
Once again asking to be recused
ryan 2025-06-10 02:44 p.m.
Who works together where @bob78711new
ryanWho works together where @bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-10 03:09 p.m.
Me and fun
bob78711new 2025-06-10 03:09 p.m.
At MSU
bob78711new 2025-06-10 03:09 p.m.
We are both professors
ryan 2025-06-11 12:09 a.m.
That doesn't mean you can't represent your client....
ryan 2025-06-11 12:09 a.m.
Do you understand how conflicts of interest work?
ryanFunpark22 2025-06-12 01:35 a.m.
Will get openings out when I can
Funpark22 2025-06-12 01:35 a.m.
I camp counsel 3 and 4 year olds and this is the first week
Funpark22 2025-06-12 01:35 a.m.
So things are a bit hectic
Funpark22Will get openings out when I can
ryan 2025-06-13 03:27 a.m.trial-state-v-glabandon
ryan 2025-06-13 03:27 a.m.
24 hours
bob78711new 2025-06-16 12:42 p.m.@ryan more than 24 hours at this point, beginning to infringe on my clients right to a speedy trial.
bob78711new 2025-06-16 12:42 p.m.
Paperless Motion to Dismiss.
bob78711new 2025-06-16 12:43 p.m.
Oh wait
bob78711new 2025-06-16 12:43 p.m.
This has a trial channel
bob78711new 2025-06-16 12:43 p.m.
Withdrawn
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-06-16 11:10 p.m.
ryan 2025-06-16 11:10 p.m.
Your motion is denied
ryan 2025-06-16 11:12 p.m.
If you invoke your client's right to a speedy trial
ryan 2025-06-16 11:12 p.m.
I will hold you in contempt and remove you if you ever lapse in the 24 hour rule
ryan 2025-06-16 11:12 p.m.
Also your adjournment is denied
ryan 2025-06-16 11:12 p.m.
^^ the request
ryan 2025-06-16 11:14 p.m.
ALSO
ryan 2025-06-16 11:15 p.m.
your client has a right to be put to a trial in a speedy manner, he was
ryan used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-20 02:54 a.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @YourExclusiveSalad (edited)
ryan 2025-06-23 05:21 p.m.@bob78711new
ryan 2025-06-23 05:21 p.m.
Hey buddy
ryan 2025-06-23 05:21 p.m.
We need to have a chat
ryanWe need to have a chat
bob78711new 2025-06-23 05:27 p.m.
Yes your honor?
bob78711new 2025-06-23 05:50 p.m.@ryan
ryan 2025-06-23 05:51 p.m.
Were you planning on filing a notice of withdrawal?
ryanWere you planning on filing a notice of withdrawal?
bob78711new 2025-06-23 08:22 p.m.
No, I’ll finish this case off
bob78711newNo, I’ll finish this case off
ryan 2025-06-29 01:56 a.m.
but you are currently employed in the DoJ?
ryanbut you are currently employed in the DoJ?
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:00 a.m.
Yes, my employer knew my circumstances before hiring me, the office I am in mainly does civil torts as well so this would have no bearing on my ability to try this case
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:00 a.m.
but if you feel that I am unable to defend my client properly I can file a notice of withdrawl
ryan 2025-06-29 02:00 a.m.
Well
ryan 2025-06-29 02:00 a.m.
what is there to defend???
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:00 a.m.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:01 a.m.
This is becoming a speedy trial violation at this point
ryan 2025-06-29 02:02 a.m.
How
ryanHow
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:09 a.m.
The government is not prosecuting???
ryan 2025-06-29 02:09 a.m.
Why would the government prosecute
ryanWhy would the government prosecute
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:09 a.m. 
ryan 2025-06-29 02:10 a.m.
are u caught up with all the happenings of this case
ryan 2025-06-29 02:10 a.m.
i dont think u r
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:10 a.m.
I believe I am
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:10 a.m.
I might have missed something when I was on vacation
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:10 a.m.
Let me look back
ryan 2025-06-29 02:10 a.m.
Well
ryan 2025-06-29 02:10 a.m.trial-state-v-glabandon
ryan 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
State and I agreed to dismiss
ryan 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
so there's no speedy trial violation
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
I did not see that
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
Alr
ryan 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
i js need to draft the order
bob78711new 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
My appologies
ryan 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
ur fine
ryan 2025-06-29 02:11 a.m.
Im lowkey never gonna write it probabyl
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-06-30 12:50 a.m.
ryan 2025-06-30 12:50 a.m.@Nicklaus archive
ryan 2025-07-17 12:08 a.m.@Prothonotary of Court please archive
Nicklaus used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-17 11:24 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-17 11:24 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1395426048942014514 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-17 11:25 a.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Volume IXExported 441 messages